Robust microsatellite markers for hybrid analysis between domesticated pigs and wild boar Markers for pig and wild boar hybridization

Main Article Content

Donovan Anderson
Yuki Negishi
Rio Toma
Junco Nagata
Hidetoshi Tamate
Shingo Kaneko


Hybridization between wild boar (Sus scrofa) and their domestic relative, pigs, is a global issue and gene flow between these populations has been known to negatively impact biodiversity with increased aggression, litter sizes, and growth. However, establishing a cost-effective analysis for long-term monitoring of possible gene flow of wild pigs into wild boar populations is challenging due to common alleles at multiple loci and often it is difficult to distinguish boar specific lineages. Therefore, there is a need to select loci with lineage specific alleles for hybrid detection. To determine these loci, we calculated allele frequencies and measurements from successfully amplified loci with DNA extracted from domestic pigs and wild boar populations from the period prior to, and after, the evacuations and disasters in Fukushima, Japan, in 2011, which resulted in an uncontrolled release of domestic pigs. Thirty-two loci showed pig putative alleles suggesting these selected loci can be useful genetic markers. Seventeen loci successfully distinguished pig and wild boar hybridization in Fukushima populations. Identified loci from this study provide a cost-efficient tool for genetic analysis and will provide a wealth of information on how an uncontrolled release of domestic livestock from natural or disasters may impact their wild relatives.



Article Details

How to Cite
Anderson, D., Negishi, Y., Toma, R., Nagata, J., Tamate, H. and Kaneko, S. (2020) “Robust microsatellite markers for hybrid analysis between domesticated pigs and wild boar: Markers for pig and wild boar hybridization”, Genetic Resources, 1(2), pp. 29–41. doi: 10.46265/genresj.BNHB8715.
Original Articles

Anderson, D et al. (2019). “Mating of escaped domestic pigs with wild boar and possibility of their offspring migration after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident”. Scientific Reports 9, p. 11537. DOI:

Blacket, M. J. et al. (2012). “Universal primers for fluorescent labelling of PCR fragments-an efficient and cost-effective approach to genotyping by fluorescence”. Molecular Ecology Resources 12(3), pp. 456–463. DOI:

Choi, S K et al. (2014). “Genetic structure of wild boar (Sus scrofa) populations from East Asia based on microsatellite loci analyses”. BMC Genetics 15, p. 85. DOI:

Dzialuk, Artur et al. (2018). “High domestic pig contribution to the local gene pool of free-living European wild boar: a case study in Poland”. Mammal Research 63(1), pp. 65–71. DOI:

FAO (2011). “Molecular genetic characterization of animal genetic resources”. FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines 9. URL:

Goddard, M. E. and B. J. Hayes (2007). “Genomic selection”. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 124(6), pp. 323–330. DOI:

Godinho, Raquel et al. (2011). “Genetic evidence for multiple events of hybridization between wolves and domestic dogs in the Iberian Peninsula”. Molecular Ecology 20(24), pp. 5154–5166. DOI:

Goedbloed, D. J. et al. (2013). “Genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism analysis reveals recent genetic introgression from domestic pigs into Northwest European wild boar populations”. Molecular Ecology 22(3), pp. 856–866. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05670.x.

Goedbloed, Daniel J et al. (2013). “Reintroductions and genetic introgression from domestic pigs have shaped the genetic population structure of Northwest European wild boar”. BMC Genetics 14(1), pp. 43–43. DOI:

Goudet, J. (1995). “FSTAT (Version 1.2): A Computer Program to Calculate F-Statistics”. Journal of Heredity 86(6), pp. 485–486. DOI:

Grossi, S F et al. (2006). “Genetic diversity in wild (Sus scrofa scrofa) and domestic (Sus scrofa domestica) pigs and their hybrids based on polymorphism of a fragment of the D-loop region in the mitochondrial DNA”. Genetics and Molecular Research 5(4), pp. 564–568.

Harrison, Richard G. and Erica L. Larson (2014). “Hybridization, Introgression, and the Nature of Species Boundaries”. Journal of Heredity 105(S1), pp. 795–809. DOI:

Hoffman, J. I. and W. Amos (2005). “Microsatellite genotyping errors: detection approaches, common sources and consequences for paternal exclusion”. Molecular Ecology 14(2), pp. 599–612. DOI:

Iacolina, Laura et al. (2018). “Hotspots of recent hybridization between pigs and wild boars in Europe”. Scientific Reports 8(1), pp. 1–10. DOI:

Ishiguro, Naotaka et al. (2002). “A Genetic Method to Distinguish Crossbred Inobuta from Japanese Wild Boars”. Zoological Science 19(11), pp. 1313–1319. DOI:

Karlskov-Mortensen, P. et al. (2007). “Identification of 10 882 porcine microsatellite sequences and virtual mapping of 4528 of these sequences”. Animal Genetics 38(4), pp. 401–405. DOI:

Kierepka, Elizabeth M. et al. (2016). “Identification of robust microsatellite markers for wild pig fecal DNA”. The Journal of Wildlife Management 80(6), pp. 1120–1128. DOI:

Kolodziej, K. et al. (2012). “Determination of the minimum number of microsatellite markers for individual genotyping in wild boar (Sus scrofa) using a test with close relatives”. European Journal of Wildlife Research 58(3), pp. 621–628. DOI:

Koutsogiannouli, Evagelia A. et al. (2010). “Detection of hybrids between wild boars (Sus scrofa scrofa) and domestic pigs (Sus scrofa f. domestica) in Greece, using the PCR-RFLP method on melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) mutations”. Mammalian Biology 75(1), pp. 69–73. DOI:

Krause, E. et al. (2002). “Radiation hybrid mapping of 273 previously unreported porcine microsatellites”. Animal Genetics 33(6), pp. 477–485. DOI:

Larson, G et al. (2005). “Worldwide phylogeography of wild boar reveals multiple centers of pig domestication”. Science 307(5715), pp. 1618–1621. DOI: 10.1126/science.1106927.

Matsumoto, Yuki et al. (2019). “Evaluation of introgressive hybridization among Cervidae in Japan’s Kinki District via two novel genetic markers developed from public NGS data”. Ecology and Evolution 9(10), pp. 5605–5616. DOI:

McCann, Blake E. et al. (2014). “Mitochondrial diversity supports multiple origins for invasive pigs”. The Journal of Wildlife Management 78(2), pp. 202–213. DOI:

Murakami, K. et al. (2014). “Evaluation of genetic introgression from domesticated pigs into the Ryukyu wild boar population on Iriomote Island in Japan”. Animal Genetics 45(4), pp. 517–523. DOI:

Nagata, J et al. (2006). “Genetic characteristics of the wild boars in Tochigi prefecture and neighboring prefectures”. Wildlife in Tochigi Pref 32, pp. 58–62.

Nijman, I J et al. (2003). “Hybridization of banteng (Bos javanicus) and zebu (Bos indicus) revealed by mitochondrial DNA, satellite DNA, AFLP and microsatellites”. Heredity 90(1), pp. 10–16. DOI:

Okuda, Kei et al. (2018). “Did domestic pigs that escaped after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident cause genetic contamination of the wild boar population?” Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology 23(1), pp. 137–144. DOI:

Peakall, R. and P. E. Smouse (2012). “GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research–an update”. Bioinformatics 28(19), pp. 2537–2539. DOI:

Peakall, Rod and Peter E. Smouse (2006). “genalex 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research”. Molecular Ecology Notes 6(1), pp. 288–295. DOI:

Pierpaoli, M et al. (2003). “Genetic distinction of wildcat (Felis silvestris) populations in Europe, and hybridization with domestic cats in Hungary”. Molecular Ecology 12(10), pp. 2585–2598. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01939.x.

Qi, X. B. et al. (2010). “Assessment of cattle genetic introgression into domestic yak populations using mitochondrial and microsatellite DNA markers”. Animal Genetics 41(3), pp. 242–252. DOI:

Randi, E (2008). “Detecting hybridization between wild species and their domesticated relatives”. Molecular Ecology 17(1), pp. 285–293. DOI:

Rhymer, Judith M. and Daniel Simberloff (1996). “Extinction by hybridization and introgression”. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27(1), pp. 83–109. DOI:

Rohrer, G A et al. (1994). “A microsatellite linkage map of the porcine genome”. Genetics 136(1), pp. 231–245.

Saito, Masayuki, Hiroshi Momose, and Tosaku Mihira (2011). “Both environmental factors and countermeasures affect wild boar damage to rice paddies in Boso Peninsula, Japan”. Crop Protection 30(8), pp. 1048–1054. DOI:

Scandura, M. et al. (2008). “Ancient vs. recent processes as factors shaping the genetic variation of the European wild boar: are the effects of the last glaciation still detectable?” Molecular Ecology 17(7), pp. 1745–1762. DOI:

Sharma, Sandeep et al. (2013). “Spatial genetic analysis reveals high connectivity of tiger (Panthera tigris) populations in the Satpura-Maikal landscape of Central India”. Ecology and Evolution 3(1), pp. 48–60. DOI:

Smouse, Peter E and Rod Peakall (1999). “Spatial autocorrelation analysis of individual multiallele and multilocus genetic structure”. Heredity 82(5), pp. 561–573. DOI:

Tadano, Ryo, Aya Nagai, and Junji Moribe (2016). “Local-scale genetic structure in the Japanese wild boar (Sus scrofa leucomystax): insights from autosomal microsatellites”. Conservation Genetics 17(5), pp. 1125–1135. DOI:

Todesco, Marco et al. (2016). “Hybridization and extinction”. Evolutionary Applications 9(7), pp. 892–908. DOI:

Touma, Shihei, Aisaku Arakawa, and Takuro Oikawa (2020). “Evaluation of the genetic structure of indigenous Okinawa Agu pigs using microsatellite markers”. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 33(2), pp. 212–218. DOI:

Uemura, Y, S Yoshimi, and H Hata (2018). “Hybridization between two bitterling fish species in their sympatric range and a river where one species is native and the other is introduced”. PLoS One 13(9), e0203423. DOI:

Vernesi, C. et al. (2003). “The genetic impact of demographic decline and reintroduction in the wild boar (Sus scrofa): A microsatellite analysis”. Molecular Ecology 12(3), pp. 585–595. DOI:

Waithman, John D. et al. (1999). “Range Expansion, Population Sizes, and Management of Wild Pigs in California”. The Journal of Wildlife Management 63(1), pp. 298–298. DOI:

Yang, Bin et al. (2017). “Genome-wide SNP data unveils the globalization of domesticated pigs”. Genetics Selection Evolution 49(1), pp. 71–71. DOI: