Exploring the situation of transboundary breeds in Europe for their effective management and conservation
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Geographical distribution plays a crucial role in the effectiveness of breeding and conservation programmes, especially for livestock breeds with a small population size. Among these, transboundary breeds present unique challenges and opportunities for conservation efforts. This study specifically examines the case of transboundary breeds in Europe and the associated challenges. Population and descriptive data were sourced from the Domestic Animal Diversity Information System (DAD-IS) to assess their current state of monitoring and management. The analysis revealed that 42% of the 6,460 National Breed Populations reported in Europe are transboundary, with 25% occurring exclusively within the region (Europe). Alarmingly, 85% of European transboundary breeds are classified as ‘at risk’ or have an ‘unknown’ conservation status, a fact that further accentuates the urgent need for improved sustainable management. This paper identifies key data gaps, for instance related to common understanding of concepts used by managers, and proposes improvements to enhance the monitoring, conservation and management of transboundary breeds in Europe.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of the articles published in Genetic Resources and grant the journal right of first publication with open access. All articles published in Genetic Resource are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to download, share and adapt the work for commercial and non-commercial purposes as long as proper attribution to the original article is given. Genetic Resources permits and encourages authors to post items submitted to the journal (including the publisher's final layout) on personal websites or institutional repositories after acceptance and/or publication, while providing bibliographic details that credit their publication in Genetic Resources.
Ablondi, M., Sabbioni, A., Stocco, G., Cipolat-Gotet, C., Dadousis, C., Kaam, J. T. V., Finocchiaro R., Summer A. (2022). Genetic diversity in the Italian Holstein dairy cattle based on pedigree and SNP data prior and after genomic selection. Frontiers in veterinary science 8:773985. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.773985
Biscarini, F., Nicolazzi, E., Stella, A., Boettcher, P., Gandini, G. (2015). Challenges and opportunities in genetic improvement of local livestock breeds. Front Genet. 6: 33. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00033
Campana, M. G., Stock, F., Barrett, E., Benecke, N., Barker, G. W. W., Seetah, K., Bower, M. A. (2012). Genetic stability in the Icelandic horse breed. Animal genetics, 43(4), 447-449.
Cao, J., Baumung, R., Boettcher, P., Scherf, B., Besbes, B. and Leroy G. (2021). Monitoring and Progress in the Implementation of the Global Plan of Action on Animal Genetic Resources. Sustainability 13(2):775. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020775
ERFP (2021). Animal Genetic Resources Strategy for Europe. https://www.animalgeneticresources.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Final_AnGR-Strategy-_022022.pdf
FAO (1999). The global strategy for the management of farm animal genetic resources. Executive Brief. Rome.
FAO (2000). The World Watch List for Domestic Animal Diversity. Rome.
FAO (2001). Animal Genetic Resources Information; Preparation of the first report on the State of the World’s animal genetic resources, Annex2. Rome.
FAO (2007a). The State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, edited by Barbara Rischkowsky & Dafydd Pilling. Rome.
FAO (2007b). Global Plan of Action for Animal Genetic Resources and the Interlaken Declaration, Rome.
https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/a1404e
FAO (2011). Report of the Thirteenth Regular Session of the Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture https://www.fao.org/4/mc192e/mc192e.pdf
FAO (2013). Guidelines In vivo conservation of animal genetic resources. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3327e.pdf
FAO (2015). The Second Report on the State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Scherf, B.D., Pilling, D., (Eds), CGRFA, Rome.
FAO (2021). Eleventh session of the Intergouvernmental Technical Working Group on animal genetic resources for food and agriculture - Status of the development of the Domestic Animal Diversity Information System - CGRFA/WG-AnGR-11/21/5, https://openknowledge.fao.org/items/0ff821b5-1043-4471-a083-61948eb9fbf6
FAO (2023). Status and trends of Animal Genetic Resources, CGRFA Intergovernmental Technical Working Group on Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, FAO, Rome https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/c8121641-5385-404f-bf98-6a584bec2e7b/content
FAO (2024a). Status and trends of Animal Genetic Resources, CGRFA Intergovernmental Technical Working Group on Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, FAO, Rome, https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/b8c17b9b-f931-4b65-bfbb-0a83a89db912/content
FAO (2024b). Thirteenth Session of the Intergovernmental Technical Working Group on Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture - CGRFA/WG-AnGR-13/24/Report, https://openknowledge.fao.org/items/9fdbfef3-85e6-4141-8448-803c995254cc/full
IBM Corp. (2020). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 27.0) [Computer software]. IBM Corp.
Lefevre, F., Bojkovski, D., BouDagher Kharrat, M., Bozzano, M., Charvolin-Lemaire, E., Hiemstra, S.J., Kraigher,H., Laloë, D., Restoux, G., Sharrock, S.,Sturaro, E., vanHintum, T., Westergren, M., Maxted, N., GenResBridge Expert Panel (2024). European genetic resources conservation in a rapidly changing world: three existential challenges for the crop, forest and animal domains in the 21st century. Genetic Resources 5(9),13–28. https://doi.org/10.46265/genresj.REJR6896
Leroy, G., Danchin-Burge, C., Palhière, I., SanCristobal, M., Nédélec, Y., Verrier, E., and Rognon, X. (2015). How do introgression events shape the partitioning of diversity among breeds: a case study in sheep. Genetics Selection Evolution 47, 1-14. DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-015-0131-7
Ligda, C., & Casabianca, F. (2013). Adding value to local breeds: challenges, strategies and key factors. Animal Genetic Resources/Resources génétiques animales/Recursos genéticos animales, 53, 107-116.
Polak, G., Sosin, E., Martyniuk. E. (2022). FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture: what it does and how it supports the livestock sector. Animal Science and Genetics vol. 18, no 4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.2197
Sponenberg, D. P., Martin, A., Couch, C., & Beranger, J. (2019). Conservation strategies for local breed biodiversity. Diversity, 11(10), 177.
Verrier, E., Audiot, A., Bertrand, C., Chapuis, H., Charvolin, E., Danchin-Burge, C., Danvy, S., Gourdine, J.L., Gaultier, P., Guémené, D., Laloë, D., Lenoir, H., Leroy, G., Naves, M., Patin, S. and Sabbagh, M. (2015). Assessing the risk status of livestock breeds: a multi-indicator method applied to 178 French local breeds belonging to ten species. Animal Genetic Resources 57, 105–118. FAO doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2078633615000260
This journal has been conceived as part of the