Is the ecosystem services concept relevant to capture the multiple benefits from farming systems using livestock biodiversity? A framework proposal

Main Article Content

Anne Lauvie
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4647-9948
Gisèle Alexandre
Valérie Angeon
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1170-3954
Nathalie Couix
Olivia Fontaine
Claire Gaillard
Michel Meuret
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8977-6355
Catherine Mougenot
Charles-Henri Moulin
Michel Naves
Marie-Odile Nozières-Petit
Jean-Christophe Paoli
Lola Perucho
Jean-Michel Sorba
Emmanuel Tillard
Etienne Verrier

Abstract

Local breeds are key components of livestock farming systems. They are part of livestock biodiversity and this diversity has been threatened since the second half of the 20th century by their replacement with animals from specialized breeds. The multiple benefits of farming systems using local breeds – provision of goods, landscape and environmental management, and uses related to cultural and heritage dimensions – have long been recognized and used to argue for their conservation. However, the notion of ecosystem services is rarely used to analyze those benefits. This article presents a qualitative approach to the provision of ecosystem services by farming systems that use livestock biodiversity. Based on diverse case studies of breeds from several species, we propose an analytical framework that accounts for how a service is qualified, who is concerned by the services identified, the role of the breed in the process of service provision, and interactions between services. Finally, the framework considers the links between the provision of services and the management of the breeds. We discuss to what extent the notion of ecosystem services is useful in dealing with the multiple benefits from farming systems using local breeds.

Article Details

How to Cite
Lauvie, A., Alexandre, G., Angeon, V., Couix, N., Fontaine, O., Gaillard, C., Meuret, M., Mougenot, C., Moulin, C.-H., Naves, M., Nozières-Petit, M.-O., Paoli, J.-C., Perucho, L., Sorba, J.-M., Tillard , E. and Verrier, E. (2023) “Is the ecosystem services concept relevant to capture the multiple benefits from farming systems using livestock biodiversity? A framework proposal”, Genetic Resources, 4(8), pp. 15–28. doi: 10.46265/genresj.MRBT4299.
Section
Original Articles
References

Ajmone-Marsan, P and Consortium GLOBALDIV (2010). “A global view of livestock biodiversity and conservation - GLOBALDIV”. Animal Genetics 41(s1), pp. 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2010.02036.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2010.02036.x

Alexandre, G, S Asselin De Beauville, et al. (2002). “La Chèvre multifonctionnelle dans la société antillaise”. Ethnozootechnie 70, pp. 35–52.

Alexandre, G, A Fanchone, et al. (2014). Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 14: Agroecology and Global Change. Ed. by Ozier-Lafontaine H and Lesueur-Jannoyer M. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 83–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06016-3_4

Amills, M, J Capote, and G Tosser-Klopp (2017). “Goat domestication and breeding: a jigsaw of historical, biological and molecular data with missing pieces”. Animal Genetics 48(6), pp. 631–644. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/age.12598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/age.12598

Audiot, A (1995). Races d’hier pour l’élevage de demain. Paris, France: INRA Editions.

Aznar, O, M Guérin, and P Perrier-Cornet (2007). “Agriculture de services, services environnementaux et politiques publiques: éléments d’analyse économique”. Revue d’Économie Régionale & Urbaine 4, pp. 573–587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/reru.074.0573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/reru.074.0573

Barnaud, C, M Antona, and J Marzin (2011). “Vers une mise en débat des incertitudes associées à la notion de service écosystémique”. Vertigo 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.10905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.10905

Barnaud, C, E Corbera, et al. (2018). “Ecosystem services, social interdependencies, and collective action: a conceptual framework”. Ecology and Society 23(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09848-230115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09848-230115

Barnaud, C and N Couix (2020). “The multifunctionality of mountain farming: Social constructions and local negotiations behind an apparent consensus”. Journal of Rural Studies 73, pp. 34–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.11.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.11.012

Berland, F, F Signoret, and B Roche (2006). “Conserver et valoriser la race bovine Maraîchine et les prairies naturelles de marais”. Les Actes du BRG 6, pp. 485–494.

Beudou, J, G Martin, and J Ryschawy (2017). “Cultural and territorial vitality services play a key role in livestock agroecological transition in France”. Agron. Sustain. Dev 37(36). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0436-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0436-8

Boval, M et al. (2012). “L’élevage traditionnel, une source et un support pour l’innovation agro-écologique : la pratique du piquet aux Antilles”. Courrier de l’Environnement de l’INRA 62, pp. 87–97.

Braat, L C (2018). “Five reasons why the Science publication “Assessing nature’s contributions to people” (Diaz et al. 2018) would not have been accepted in Ecosystem Services”. Ecosystem Services 30, A1–A2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.002

Cord, A F et al. (2017). “Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: Main concepts, methods and the road ahead”. Ecosystem Services 28(C), pp. 264–272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.012

Couix, N et al. (2016). “Des races localement adaptées et adoptées, une condition de la durabilité des activités d’élevage”. Cahiers d’Agriculture 25(6), p. 650009. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/650010.651051/cagri/2016052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2016052

Dedieu, B et al. (2008). “Systèmes d’élevage, un concept pour raisonner les transformations de l’élevage”. INRA Prod Anim 21(1), pp. 45–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20870/productions-animales.2008.21.1.3374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20870/productions-animales.2008.21.1.3374

Dendoncker, N et al. (2018). “How can integrated valuation of ecosystem services help understanding and steering agroecological transitions?” Ecology and Society 23(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09843-230112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09843-230112

Díaz, S, U Pascual, M Stenseke, B Martín-López, R. T. Watson, et al. (2018). “Assessing nature’s contributions to people”. Science 359(6373), pp. 270–272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8826. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8826

Droste, N, D Amato, and J J Goddard (2018). “Where communities intermingle, diversity grows - The evolution of topics in ecosystem service research”. PLOS ONE 13, (9):e0204749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204749

Dumont, B et al. (2019). “Review: Associations among goods, impacts and ecosystem services provided by livestock farming”. Animal 13(8), pp. 1773–1784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118002586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118002586

Faith, D P (2018). “Avoiding paradigm drifts in IPBES: reconciling "nature’s contributions to people",biodiversity, and ecosystem services”. Ecology and Society 23(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10195-230240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10195-230240

FAO (2015). The Second Report on the State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Ed. by B D Scherf and D Pilling. Rome: FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Assessments. URL: https://www.fao.org/3/i4787e/i4787e.pdf.

Fisher, B, R K Turner, and P Morling (2009). “Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making”. Ecological Economics 68(3), pp. 643–653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014

Flori, L et al. (2012). “A Quasi-Exclusive European Ancestry in the Senepol Tropical Cattle Breed Highlights the Importance of the slick Locus in Tropical Adaptation”. PLOS ONE 7(5), e36133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036133

Fontaine, O et al. (2008). “Hindouisme et sacrifice de boucs à l’Île de la Réunion”. Ethnozootechnie 85, pp. 101–110.

Gaillard, C, C Mougenot, and S Petit (2018). “Le fromage de Comté dans l’ère du temps. Succès et tensions. ” Temporalités, Revue de sciences sociales et humaines 28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/temporalites.5377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/temporalites.5377

Gandini, G C and E Villa (2003). “Analysis of the cultural value of local livestock breeds: a methodology”. J. Anim. Breed. Genet 120, pp. 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0388.2003.00365.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0388.2003.00365.x

Gautier, M and M Naves (2011). “Footprints of selection in the ancestral admixture of a New World Creole cattle breed”. Molecular Ecology 20, pp. 3128–3143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05163.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05163.x

Gourdine, J L et al. (2021). “Assessment of ecosystem services provided by livestock agroecosystems in the tropics: a case study of tropical island environment of Guadeloupe”. Tropical Animal Health and Production 53, pp. 435–435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02880-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02880-3

Haines-Young, R and M B Potschin (2018). Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1 and Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure. URL: https://cices.eu/resources/. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e27108

Hall, S J G (2019). “Livestock biodiversity as interface between people, landscapes and nature”. People and Nature 1(3), pp. 284–290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.23

Hall, S J G and D G Bradley (1995). “Conserving livestock breed biodiversity”. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10(7), pp. 267–270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(95)90005-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(95)90005-5

Hoffmann, I, T From, and D Boerma (2014). Ecosystem services provided by livestock species and breeds, with special consideration to the contributions of small-scale livestock keepers and pastoralists. URL: https://www.fao.org/3/at598e/at598e.pdf.

Huang, J et al. (2015). “Comparative review of multifunctionality and ecosystem services in sustainable agriculture”. Journal of Environmental Management 149, pp. 138–147. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.10.020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.10.020

Hubert, B (2011). La rusticité: l’animal, la race, le système d’élevage? Pastum Hors Série. Association Française de Pastoralisme, Agropolis international et Cardère éditeur.

INRA (2014). Races animales françaises menacées d’abandon pour l’agriculture. URL: https://agriculture.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/races_menacees_rapport_methodologique.pdf.

Kull, C, X Arnauld De Sartre, and M Castro (2015). “The political ecology of ecosystem services”. Geoforum 61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.03.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.03.004

Lauvie, A et al. (2017). “Comment les diverses formes de valorisation des races locales interagissent avec leur conservation”. Ethnozootechnie 103, pp. 7–12.

Leroy, G et al. (2018). “Animal genetic resources diversity and ecosystem services”. Global Food Security 17, pp. 84–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2018.04.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2018.04.003

Lescourret, F et al. (2015). “A social-ecological approach to managing multiple agro-ecosystem services”. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14, pp. 68–75. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.04.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.04.001

Ligda, C and F Casabianca (2013). “Adding value to local breeds: challenges, strategies and key factors”. Animal Genetic Resources 53, pp. 107–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S207863361300026X

Mace, G M, K Norris, and A H Fitter (2012). “Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship”. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 27(1), pp. 19–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.006

Marshall, K et al. (2016). “Traditional livestock breeding practices of men and women Somali pastoralists: trait preferences and selection of breeding animals”. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 133(6), pp. 534–547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12223

Marsoner, T et al. (2018). “Indigenous livestock breeds as indicators for cultural ecosystem services: A spatial analysis within the Alpine Space”. Ecological Indicators 94, pp. 55–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.06.046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.06.046

Martin-Collado, D, P Boettcher, and A Bernués (2019). “Opinion paper: livestock agroecosystems provide ecosystem services but not their components - the case of species and breeds”. Animal 13, pp. 1–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119001277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119001277

Mathias, E, P Mundy, and I Koehler-Rollefson (2010). “Marketing products from local livestock breeds: an analysis of eight cases”. Animal Genetic Resources 47, pp. 59–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2078633610001001

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press. URL: https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf.

Naves, M et al. (2011). “Les races animales locales: bases du développement innovant et durable de l’élevage aux Antilles”. Innovations Agronomiques 16, pp. 193–205.

Norgaard, R B (2010). “Ecosystem services: From eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder”. Ecological Economics 69, pp. 1219–1227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.009

O Nozieres-Petit, M and A Lauvie (2018). “Diversité des contributions des systèmes d’élevage de races locales. Les points de vue des éleveurs de trois races ovines méditerranéennes”. Cah Agric 27, p. 65003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2018039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2018039

O Rege, J E and J P Gibson (2003). “Animal genetic resources and economic development: issues in relation to economic valuation”. Ecological economics 45, pp. 319–330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00087-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00087-9

Ovaska, U and K Soini (2016). “Native Breeds as Providers of Ecosystem Services:The Stakeholders’ Perspective”. TRACE finnish journal for human-animal studies 2, pp. 28–51.

Perucho, L et al. (2020). “Diversity of breeding practices is linked to the use of collective tools for the genetic management of the Corsican sheep breed”. Italian Journal of Animal Science 19, pp. 158–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2020.1713027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2020.1713027

Peterson, G D et al. (2018). “Welcoming different perspectives in IPBES: Nature’s contributions to people and Ecosystem services”. Ecology and Society 23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10134-230139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10134-230139

Poussard, A et al. (2016). Rusticité des races: Définition. Dictionnaire d’Agroecologie. URL: https://dicoagroecologie.fr/encyclopedie/rusticite-des-races/.

Rodríguez-Ortega, T et al. (2014). “Applying the ecosystem services framework to pasture-based livestock farming systems in Europe”. Animal 8, pp. 1361–1372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114000421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114000421

Ryschawy, J et al. (2017). “Assessing multiple goods and services derived from livestock farming on a nation-wide gradient”. Animal, pp. 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s1751731117000829. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117000829

Steger, C et al. (2018). “Ecosystem Services as Boundary Objects for Transdisciplinary Collaboration”. Ecological Economics 143, pp. 153–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.016

Teixeira, H M et al. (2018). “Farmers show complex and contrasting perceptions on ecosystem services and their management”. Ecosystem Services 33, pp. 44–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.08.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.08.006

Velado-Alonso, E et al. (2021). “Disentangling the Multidimensional Relationship between Livestock Breeds and Ecosystem Services”. Animals 11, (9):2548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092548

Verrier, E et al. (2005). “Conservation and value of local livestock breeds: usefulness of niche products and/or adaptation to specific environments”. Animal Genetic Resources 36, pp. 21–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1014233900005538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1014233900005538

Woo, S E, E H O’Boyle, and P E Spector (2017). “Best practices in developing, conducting, and evaluating inductive research”. Human Resource Management Review 27(2), pp. 255–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.08.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.08.004

Zhang, W et al. (2007). “Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture”. Ecological Economics 64(2), pp. 253–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.024

Zoom-Guadeloupe (2012). Bois Jolan. URL: http://zoom-guadeloupe.fr/component/content/article?d4dad6935f632ac35975e3001dc7bbe8=a9597d0cde95aa2b7dedeee2f2dd7eca%5C&showall=1%5C&id=42.