Genebank Peer Reviews: A powerful tool to improve genebank quality and promote collaboration

Main Article Content

Theo van Hintum
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4953-4700
Sharon Balding
Gergana Desheva
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5146-1972
John Dickie
María José Díez
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1422-2144
Luis Guasch
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7117-767X
Pavol Hauptvogel
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0148-9496
Vojtěch Holubec
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8113-0111
Dagmar Janovská
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4894-097X
Ulrike Lohwasser
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3788-5258
Isaura Martín
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1826-0711
Ludmila Papoušková
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6228-9901
Beate Schierscher-Viret
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8202-7456
Lise Lykke Steffensen
https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1845-0732
Katya Uzundzhalieva
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3906-9497
Patrizia Vaccino
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8503-3263
José Vicente Valcárcel
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7843-703X

Abstract

The conservation of plant genetic resources (PGR) is critical to ensuring global food security and agricultural sustainability. Genebanks play a vital role in ex situ conservation, complementing in situ strategies by preserving crop diversity (incl. their wild relatives) and providing access to biological materials for research, breeding and farming. However, maintaining high conservation standards and ensuring accessibility remains a global challenge. To address this, the ‘Genebank Peer Review’ system was developed as a collaborative quality assessment and improvement mechanism. This system facilitates reciprocal evaluations among genebanks, promoting transparency, capacity building and continuous improvement in conservation practices. Implemented in Europe since 2019, the peer review process involves structured self-assessments, site visits and expert evaluations, culminating in publicly available reports that guide genebanks in enhancing their operations. Feedback from participating institutions highlights the system's effectiveness in fostering knowledge exchange, strengthening professional networks and improving genebank management practices. Despite its success, challenges remain, particularly regarding expert availability and resource constraints. Future efforts should focus on institutionalizing mentorship programmes to sustain and expand the impact of Genebank Peer Reviews and monitor improvements.

 

 

Article Details

How to Cite
van Hintum, T., Balding, S., Desheva, G., Dickie, J., Díez, M. J., Guasch, L., Hauptvogel, P., Holubec, V., Janovská, D., Lohwasser, U., Martín, I., Papoušková, L., Schierscher-Viret, B., Steffensen, L. L., Uzundzhalieva, K., Vaccino, P. and Valcárcel, J. V. (2025) “Genebank Peer Reviews: A powerful tool to improve genebank quality and promote collaboration”, Genetic Resources, 6(11), pp. 115–121. doi: 10.46265/genresj.OADZ7911.
Section
Original Articles
References

ECPGR (2010). Template for the preparation of operational genebank manuals (Final version formally approved by the AEGIS Advisory Committee - 24.09.2010) 28p. URL: https://www.ecpgr.org/fileadmin/templates/ecpgr.org/upload/AEGIS/Documents/Procedures_examples/Template_for_the_preparation_of_operational_genebank_manuals.doc. (visited on 03/04/2025)

ECPGR (2025a). AQUAS: Quality System for AEGIS. URL: https://www.ecpgr.org/aegis/aquas/overview (visited on 02/26/2025).

ECPGR (2025b). Genebank capacity building peer visits. URL: https://www.ecpgr.org/aegis/aquas/peer-visits (visited on 03/04/2025).

Engels, J M M, L Maggioni, and E Lipman (2019). Assessing current practices and procedures to strengthen AEGIS, the initiative for A European Genebank Integrated System. Report of a Workshop, 10-12 December 2018, San Fernando de Henares, Madrid, Spain. Rome, Italy: European Cooperative Programme for Plant Genetic Resources. URL: https://www.ecpgr.org/fileadmin/bioversity/publications/pdfs/AEGIS_Workshop_report_-_final_01_03_2019.pdf.

Engels, J M M and A W Ebert (2021). “A Critical Review of the Current Global Ex Situ Conservation System for Plant Agrobiodiversity. I. History of the Development of the Global System in the Context of the Political/Legal Framework and Its Major Conservation Components”. Plants 10, pp. 1557–1557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10081557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10081557

EU (2014). Regulation (EU) No 511/2014 of the European parliament and of the council of 16 April 2014 on compliance measures for users from the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization in the Union. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014R0511.

FAO (2009). International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. URL: https://www.fao.org/3/i0510e/i0510e.pdf.

FAO (2014). Genebank Standards for Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Rome, p. 167. URL: https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/612be5af-72cc-4017-afc2-936e9be6c6ed/content.

FAO (2025). World Information and Early Warning System on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (WIEWS). URL: https://www.fao.org/wiews (visited on 01/23/2025).

GenRes Bridge (2021). Genres Bridge deliverable D15: A peer review system is designed and tested in three pilot cases; reports of these cases are published on the project, ECPGR and ERFP websites. Report compiled by Theo van Hintum, Centre for Genetic Resources , The Netherlands (CGN). URL: https://www.genresbridge.eu/fileadmin/templates/Genres/Uploads/Documents/Reports/D.3.5.pdf.

Hintum, T van, M J Díez, et al. (2019). Pilot: Genebank Peer Reviews - Observations and conclusions based on one cycle of three genebank peer reviews. Report. URL: https://www.ecpgr.org/fileadmin/templates/ecpgr.org/upload/AEGIS/PEER_REVIEWS/Pilot_Genebank_Peer_Reviews_-_observations_and_conclusions_rev.pdf.

Hintum, T van, J M M Engels, and L Maggioni (2021). “AEGIS, the Virtual European Genebank: Why It Is Such a Good Idea, Why It Is Not Working and How It Could Be Improved”. 10(10), p. 2165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10102165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10102165

Hintum, T van and E Wijnker (2024). “Quality management in a genebank environment: Principles and experiences at the Centre for Genetic Resources, The Netherlands (CGN)”. Genetic Resources(S2), pp. 6–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46265/genresj.RFXB3570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46265/genresj.RFXB3570

Lusty, C, J Van Beem, and F R Hay (2021). “A Performance Management System for Long-Term Germplasm Conservation in CGIAR Genebanks: Aiming for Quality, Efficiency and Improvement”. Plants 10(12), p. 2627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122627